Music therapy may have a role in easing symptoms of depression in combination with standard treatments but its value as a sole intervention is even less clear
Music therapy may have a role in easing symptoms of depression
in combination with standard treatments but its value as a sole intervention is
even less clear, according to an article in Issue 1 (2008) of the Cochrane Database
of Systematic Reviews.
The current analysis was based on review of five small studies. Four found
that patients who received music therapy had a reduction in symptoms of depression,
whereas patients who did not receive therapy had no change. The fifth study did
not find any difference.
The benefits of music appeared greatest when providers used theory-based therapeutic
techniques rather than development based on their own ideas.
"In the four studies where there was an impact, there was a very coherent
theoretical framework, a very coherent explanation of what went on in the session
and obvious reasons why the therapists were there," said lead author Anna Maratos.
"In the study that showed no effect, there didn't seem to be any theoretical underpinning
to the intervention. We have no idea why the therapist was there, really."
Therapeutic interventions included listening to music in groups, body movement
and painting to music, and improvised singing.
Maratos, head of profession for Arts Therapies at the Central and Northwest
London NHS Foundation Trust, and colleagues looked for randomized controlled trials
that compared music therapy with other, more traditional interventions for depression.
They found a dearth of rigorous research.
Because there was little or no uniformity in study approaches, study populations
or therapeutic techniques, the researchers did not pool the results for meta-analysis.
Maratos said that although the fifth study did not meet reviewers' eligibility
criteria, it was included because it was the only study with a certified professional
coordinating the sessions.
The reviewers defined music therapy as an intervention designed to improve
health status that included musical interaction between therapist and patient
within a structured theoretical framework and in which outcomes were born of music,
talk inspired by music or therapeutic relationships.
Each study author determined his or her own definition of standard care, on
the other hand, which included pharmacological, routine hospital and cognitive
therapeutic treatment.
Three studies focused on adults aged 60 and older, one study looked at adults
between ages 21 and 65 years, and one focused on 14- and 15-year-old adolescents.
Although the studies did not show a definitive cause-and-effect relationship
between music therapy and clinical improvement in depression, the authors found
a positive correlation. They attributed the unevenness of the studies' results
to the varied uses of music by therapists in the studies and the relative weakness
of some researchers' methods.
The researchers found unusually high levels of participation and compliance
among patients receiving the interventions.
Shara Sand, Psy.D., clinical assistant professor of psychology at Yeshiva University
in New York City, agreed with researchers' conclusion that meta-analysis was not
possible in the review, but said that the evidence of music's influence on mood
makes the research question interesting.
"It does make me wonder: What is standardized treatment in music therapy- There's
really a whole avenue of research that should be done," Sand said.
She adding that music therapy broadens the range of interventions available
to people who might shy away from traditional approaches: "There's often an isolation
and alienation; a difficulty connecting and with relatedness" for people with
depression, and the music therapy might offer a less threatening option.
Maratos said that her own status as a licensed music therapist spurred her
interest in doing the review and added that music therapy is a state-sanctioned
mental health treatment in the United Kingdom.
|