Asenapine proves more effective than placebo in a phase III study as treatment for acute manic and mixed episodes associated with bipolar I disorder
The investigational agent asenapine is more effective
than placebo in treating acute manic and mixed episodes associated with bipolar
I disorder, according to phase III study results presented at the annual meeting
of the American Psychiatric Association.
In the 3-week study, patients treated randomized to either
asenapine or olanzapine showed significant improvement in symptoms of acute mania
compared with those randomized to placebo. Both active agents showed superiority
versus placebo by the second day of treatment and maintained significant benefit
throughout the course of the trial.
"The consequences of untreated mania in patients
with bipolar disorder can be devastating to patients and their families. We need
more effective and more tolerable treatments for these patients," said Robert
Hirschfeld, MD, Professor and Chair of the Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral
Sciences at The University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston. "The results
of this trial suggest that asenapine is an attractive option for the acute treatment
of mania because of its rapid onset of action and modest side effect profile.”
The Phase III, double-blind, international trial enrolled
488 patients with a manic (69 percent) or mixed episode (31 percent) of bipolar
I disorder and a baseline Young Mania Rating Scale (YMRS) score greater than or
equal to 20. The YMRS is an 11-item scale used to evaluate manic symptoms; a score
of at least 20 represents moderate-to-severe mania.
Patients were randomized to asenapine (5-10 mg twice
daily; average daily dose, 18.2 mg), olanzapine (5-20 mg once daily; average daily
dose, 15.8 mg), or placebo for three weeks. Dosing was flexible. The primary efficacy
endpoint was a reduction in YMRS total score at day 21. Safety measures included
adverse events, weight gain and scores on measures of extrapyramidal symptoms.
On day 2, both asenapine and olanzapine provided greater
mean score reductions versus placebo (-3.0 and -3.4, respectively, vs. -1.5; p<0.008
for asenapine, p<0.001 for olanzapine). At the end of the trial (day 21), both
active treatments continued to produce significant mean improvements in mania
symptoms versus placebo (-10.8 and -12.6, respectively, vs. -5.5; both p<0.0001).
The overall incidence of treatment-related adverse events
was 60.8 percent for asenapine, 52.9 percent for olanzapine, and 36.2 percent
for placebo. Most adverse events were mild to moderate, with the most common events
(>6 percent) for asenapine including sedation, dizziness, headache, somnolence,
and fatigue.
Olanzapine was most commonly associated with sedation,
dry mouth, dizziness, headache, somnolence, and weight gain.
The incidence of extrapyramidal symptoms reported as
an adverse event was 7.2 percent for asenapine, 7.9 percent for olanzapine, and
2.9 percent for placebo.
|