Breast-specific gamma imaging uncovers malignancies not found on mammography or routine physical exam
Breast-specific gamma imaging (BSGI) is effective in
detecting invasive lobular carcinoma and other malignancies not found on mammograms
or by clinical examination in women newly diagnosed with breast cancer, according
to a study presented at the annual meeting of the Radiological Society of North
America (RSNA).
"BSGI can identify the most difficult to detect
breast cancer-invasive lobular carcinoma," said lead author Rachel F. Brem,
M.D., professor of radiology and director of the Breast Imaging and Interventional
Center at The George Washington University Medical Center in Washington, D.C.
"It also can help us detect additional lesions of all types of breast cancer
in women whose mammograms show only one suspicious lesion."
Most experts agree that the best way to decrease breast
cancer mortality is through early detection using mammography and clinical breast
exam. However, some cancers are difficult to detect with mammography and clinical
exam, particularly in the earliest stage when treatment is most effective.
While mammography findings are characterized by the difference
in appearance between normal and suspicious breast tissue, BSGI findings are based
on how cancerous cells function.
"It is this physiological approach to breast cancer
diagnosis that allows for improved cancer detection," Dr. Brem said.
BSGI is an emerging molecular imaging technology using
a high-resolution gamma camera that allows for imaging with very mild compression
of the breast along with an injection of a radiotracer [sestamibi (technicium
99m)]. Because cancerous cells have a higher rate of metabolic activity, the tracer
is taken up by these cells at a higher level than in normal cells. BSGI measures
uptake to assess cellular activity.
Dr. Brem and colleagues reviewed the records of 159 women
with at least one suspicious or cancerous lesion found by mammography or physical
exam, who had undergone BSGI to determine if additional lesions were present.
BSGI results showed an additional suspicious lesion missed
by mammography and physical exam in 46 (29 percent) of the women. In 14 (36 percent)
of the 39 women who underwent biopsy, the newly discovered lesions were cancerous.
There are few or no contraindications with BSGI. It can
be used in diabetics and in patients with compromised renal function, and there
are no weight restrictions or other limitations
"The data suggest that BSGI allows for the diagnosis
of more and earlier breast cancers," Dr. Brem said.
Dr. Brem pointed out that BSGI is not meant to replace
mammography, but to be used as an adjunct to mammography. "It is an excellent
tool for locating difficult-to-detect cancers and for screening high-risk women
who have normal mammograms and physical examination," she said.
|