The majority of men treated with high-dose intensity-modulated radiation therapy for prostate cancer are alive without disease eight years afterward
Results from the largest study of men with clinically
localized prostate cancer treated with high-dose, intensity-modulated radiation
therapy show that the majority are alive without evidence of disease after an
average follow-up of eight years, according to an article in the October issue
of the Journal of Urology.
Between April 1996 and January 2000, 561 patients with
a median age of 68 years (range, 46 to 86 years old) were treated with intensity-modulated
radiation therapy, an improved form of three-dimensional conformal radiation therapy,
at Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Institute.
Pre-treatment diagnostic evaluations were performed for
all patients to better define their clinically localized prostate cancer. They
were classified into prognostic risk groups as defined by the National Comprehensive
Cancer Network guidelines. Clinical characteristics that were weighed included
age, T stage, Gleason score, prostate-specific antigen level, and pre-treatment
with neoadjuvant androgen deprivation.
The eight-year results show urinary continence was maintained
in all patients, and only 9 (1.6 percent) patients experienced rectal bleeding.
Radiation therapy was curative for the majority of the patients in all three prognostic
risk groups, with 89 percent of the favorable, 78 percent of the intermediate,
and 67 percent of the unfavorable group alive after an average of eight years.
Among men who were potent prior to therapy, erectile dysfunction developed in
49 percent.
This report is the first description of long-term outcomes
for prostate cancer patients treated with that therapy.
“Our results suggest that intensity-modulated radiation
therapy [IMRT] should be the treatment of choice for delivering high-dose, external
beam radiotherapy for patients with localized prostate cancer,” said Michael J.
Zelefsky, MD, Chief of the Brachytherapy Service at Memorial Sloan-Kettering.
“We were able to show long-term safety and long-term
efficacy in a very diverse group of prostate cancer patients that we followed
? many for as long as ten years. Despite the fact that some patients had an aggressive
form of disease with high Gleason scores and prostate specific antigen levels,
the overwhelming majority had good tumor control with neither recurrence of their
original cancer nor development of second cancers, which one might have expected
from the high doses of radiation.”
“This study confirms that we can improve patients’ quality
of life by reducing the side effects of radiotherapy while maintaining disease-free
survival,” said Zelefsky. “However, there is still room for improvement. We are
incorporating image-guided approaches that may continue the excellent tumor control
but further limit the area we are irradiating and reduce side-effects."
|