Magnetic resonance imaging is better than multidetector computed tomography for preoperative determination whether breast cancer has invaded breast ducts
Magnetic resonance imaging is better than multidetector
computed tomography for determining if and how far breast cancer has invaded breast
ducts and should be done before breast-conserving therapy, according to an article
in the August issue of the American Journal of Roentgenology.
“Patients have a lower survival rate if their surgical
margins are positive for tumor cells. A positive surgical margin is usually the
result of inadequate resection of the cancer’s intraductal component,” said Akiko
Shimauchi, MD, Tohoku University, Sendai, Japan. “Accurate preoperative diagnosis
of the intraductal component allows the surgeon to achieve a cancer-free surgical
margin.”
The study included 69 patients with proven invasive cancer,
with 44 tumors known to have an intraductal component, said Shimauchi. Magnetic
resonance imaging correctly identified 33 of the 44 cases, while multidetector
computed tomography correctly identified 27 of 44.
“Magnetic resonance revealed the presence of the intraductal
component with significantly higher sensitivity (75 percent) compared to multidetector
computed tomography (61 percent),” Shimauchi said.
“The lesions that were missed by both examinations were
the ductal extension type, that is--- the tumor included a dominant mass with
an outward extension of cancer cells, with a relatively small ductal component,”
said Shimauchi. Magnetic resonance imaging was better able to detect the smaller
ductal components.
Although researchers found that both modalities “generally underestimated the
length of the intraductal component,” magnetic resonance was less likely to underestimate
the length of the intraductal component.
Shimauchi said, “In our institution, surgeons err on
the side of caution by using a surgical margin that is 20 mm outside the radiologically
determined tumor margin.”
She added that underestimation of the length of the intraductal
components by 15 mm or more was significantly less frequent with magnetic resonance
(30 percent) than with computed tomography (55% percent).
|