• AHA
  • ESC
  • ASCO
  • ACC
  • RSNA
  • ISC
  • SABCS
  • AACR
  • APA
  • Archives
株式会社ヘスコインターナショナルは、法令を遵守し本サイトをご利用いただく皆様の個人情報の取り扱いに細心の注意を払っております。

New simple-to-use office test is significantly more effective than conventional laboratory testing for diagnosis of bladder cancer

A simple, office-based test is three times more effective than a conventional laboratory test for detecting bladder cancer, according to an article in the February 16th issue of the Journal of the American Medical Association.

In the current work, American researchers tested the NMP22 tumor marker assay in 1,331 patients at high risk for bladder cancer. Researchers determined through cystoscopy that 79 of the 1,331 patients examined had bladder cancer. The NMP22 assay was positive in 55 percent of cases (44 of 79 cases), while the conventional cytology test detected about 16 percent of cases (12 of 76 cases).

This demonstrated that the NMP22 test was significantly more sensitive than cytology, the conventional laboratory test, said H. Barton Grossman, M.D., professor in M. D. Anderson's Department of Urology and the study's lead author.

"Our challenge is to improve the detection of bladder cancer," said Grossman. "This test is easy and may save lives."

He cautioned, however, that NMP22 should not be used alone to detect bladder cancer, but should be combined with cystoscopy to provide an accurate diagnosis.
"No single procedure is 100 percent sensitive, so a combination of procedures is recommended," Grossman added.

The findings are seen as an advance in screening for bladder cancer, the fifth most common cancer in the United States, according to Grossman. Five-year survival is 95 percent for cancer caught at an early stage, but survival is much lower for the 25 percent of bladder tumors that are advanced when first diagnosed. It is estimated that more than 60,000 people living in the U.S. will be diagnosed with bladder cancer this year; 13,000 are predicted to die of the disease.

Grossman led a team of researchers at M. D. Anderson and 23 academic, private practice, and veterans' facilities in 10 states who enrolled patients into the clinical trial that examined the effectiveness of these different diagnostic tests.

Patients enrolled in the trial were suspected of having bladder cancer because they had evidence of blood in their urine and met some of the risk factors associated with the disease, which include a history of smoking, exposure to certain chemicals, being over age 40 years, and painful and frequent urination. Tobacco use is the most common risk factor, accounting for about 50 percent of bladder cancer, Grossman says.

To conduct the study, a sample of urine collected from the patients was divided in half, and one part was used for the NMP22 test. The rest was used for a cytology test, which is the screening method physicians traditionally use. The cytology test looks for abnormal cells in the urine and must be sent to outside laboratories for evaluation. Patients may wait as long as a week to receive these results, according to Grossman, while the results of the NMP22 test can be read within 30 to 50 minutes in the doctor's office.

The patients also received a cystoscopy, which uses a flexible endoscope to examine the bladder. This low-risk procedure can be performed under local anesthesia in a doctor's office and is considered the "gold standard" of diagnostic tests, but can fail to detect some bladder cancers, said Grossman.

In this study, the researchers looked at the sensitivity as well as the specificity of cytology versus the NMP22 test. Although NMP22 was more sensitive, cytology was more specific (99 percent versus 86 percent), meaning that the number of false positives was higher for the NMP22 test.

Still, the authors concluded that "the high specificity of cytology is offset by low sensitivity, ambiguous test results, expense, and time lag to obtain reports."

 


DOLについて - 利用規約 -  会員規約 -  著作権 - サイトポリシー - 免責条項 - お問い合わせ
Copyright 2000-2025 by HESCO International, Ltd.