New simple-to-use office test is significantly more effective than conventional laboratory testing for diagnosis of bladder cancer
A simple, office-based test is three times
more effective than a conventional laboratory test for detecting
bladder cancer, according to an article in the February 16th issue
of the Journal of the American Medical Association.
In the current work, American researchers
tested the NMP22 tumor marker assay in 1,331 patients at high risk
for bladder cancer. Researchers determined through cystoscopy that
79 of the 1,331 patients examined had bladder cancer. The NMP22
assay was positive in 55 percent of cases (44 of 79 cases), while
the conventional cytology test detected about 16 percent of cases
(12 of 76 cases).
This demonstrated that the NMP22 test was
significantly more sensitive than cytology, the conventional laboratory
test, said H. Barton Grossman, M.D., professor in M. D. Anderson's
Department of Urology and the study's lead author.
"Our challenge is to improve the detection
of bladder cancer," said Grossman. "This test is easy
and may save lives."
He cautioned, however, that NMP22 should
not be used alone to detect bladder cancer, but should be combined
with cystoscopy to provide an accurate diagnosis.
"No single procedure is 100 percent sensitive, so a combination
of procedures is recommended," Grossman added.
The findings are seen as an advance in screening
for bladder cancer, the fifth most common cancer in the United States,
according to Grossman. Five-year survival is 95 percent for cancer
caught at an early stage, but survival is much lower for the 25
percent of bladder tumors that are advanced when first diagnosed.
It is estimated that more than 60,000 people living in the U.S.
will be diagnosed with bladder cancer this year; 13,000 are predicted
to die of the disease.
Grossman led a team of researchers at M.
D. Anderson and 23 academic, private practice, and veterans' facilities
in 10 states who enrolled patients into the clinical trial that
examined the effectiveness of these different diagnostic tests.
Patients enrolled in the trial were suspected
of having bladder cancer because they had evidence of blood in their
urine and met some of the risk factors associated with the disease,
which include a history of smoking, exposure to certain chemicals,
being over age 40 years, and painful and frequent urination. Tobacco
use is the most common risk factor, accounting for about 50 percent
of bladder cancer, Grossman says.
To conduct the study, a sample of urine collected
from the patients was divided in half, and one part was used for
the NMP22 test. The rest was used for a cytology test, which is
the screening method physicians traditionally use. The cytology
test looks for abnormal cells in the urine and must be sent to outside
laboratories for evaluation. Patients may wait as long as a week
to receive these results, according to Grossman, while the results
of the NMP22 test can be read within 30 to 50 minutes in the doctor's
office.
The patients also received a cystoscopy,
which uses a flexible endoscope to examine the bladder. This low-risk
procedure can be performed under local anesthesia in a doctor's
office and is considered the "gold standard" of diagnostic
tests, but can fail to detect some bladder cancers, said Grossman.
In this study, the researchers looked at
the sensitivity as well as the specificity of cytology versus the
NMP22 test. Although NMP22 was more sensitive, cytology was more
specific (99 percent versus 86 percent), meaning that the number
of false positives was higher for the NMP22 test.
Still, the authors concluded that "the
high specificity of cytology is offset by low sensitivity, ambiguous
test results, expense, and time lag to obtain reports."
|