Newest implantable prostheses can extend leg length in child and young adult survivors of osteosarcoma without need for additional surgery
New implantable leg prostheses that allow
physicians to extend bone length without additional surgical procedures
show great promise in rehabilitation of child and young adult survivors
of osteosarcoma, according to an article in the February issue of
Mechanical Engineering magazine.
Several new devices represent a third generation
of leg prostheses for young survivors of osteosarcoma who have not
finished growing yet. The first generation, developed in the late
1970s, employed screws to lengthen the affected bone. The second
generation devices, which are still in use in many areas, were designed
in modules that could be removed and fitted with a larger module
over time. Both types required a surgical procedure for each unit
of bone extension.
The newest generation requires only one surgical
procedure to implant the prosthesis. Extension over time is accomplished
with noninvasive means. One such device, produced by Stanmore Implants
Worldwide, a British company, requires implantation of a lead screw-rotor
device. During office visits, an external source of energy causes
the rotor to rotate such that the lead screw advances (lengthening
the bone) 0.25 mm per minute. After a painless office visit lasting
approximately 15 minutes, the patient can walk away.
An American variant, The Wright Repiphysis
system (which was approved for use in the USA in 2002) requires
implantation of a spring-loaded extender in a pair of nested tubes,
with the entire mechanism encased in a special polymer material.
Use of an external electromagnetic wave source during an office
visit provides the energy to make the polymer gradually soften,
allowing the extender to lengthen within its nest of tubing.
Brian McDaniel, an engineer with the Wright
company, said that even though the majority of American orthopedic
oncology specialists still use modular prostheses, they “are giving
the noninvasive forms (of prosthesis) strong consideration because
they limit the surgery and rehabilitation their young patients must
endure.”
|