Daily
sunscreen slows development of solar keratoses whereas daily doses
of beta carotene have no effect
Daily use of sunscreen slows the acquisition
of solar keratoses, whereas daily doses of beta carotene have no
effect on development of the skin lesions, according to an article
in the April issue of The Archives of Dermatology.
According to information in the article, the
presence of solar keratoses is one of the strongest predictors of
skin cancer. The risks for basal cell carcinoma and squamous cell
carcinoma are increased 3-fold to 12-fold in the presence of solar
keratoses.
Steven Darlington, B.Sc., and his Australian
colleagues designed the current study to evaluate whether controlling
development of the benign skin lesions might reduce the risk of
skin cancer.
A total of 1,621 adults ages 25 to 74 years were randomized to daily
use of sunscreen (applied to the head, neck, arms, and hands every
morning) or application of sunscreen at their own discretion. The
participants were also randomly assigned to take 30 mg beta carotene
or placebo daily. The study was conducted between 1992 and 1996.
The researchers found that the ratio of solar
keratosis counts in 1994 relative to the start of the study in 1992
was lower in people randomized to daily sunscreen than in those
randomized to discretionary use. The researchers wrote that the
24 percent reduction is equivalent to the prevention of an average
of 1 additional lesion per person over that time period.
No effect was found on the rate of change
of solar keratosis counts in participants on beta carotene supplementation
compared with those on placebo.
"Our study found that the number of prevalent
solar keratoses increased over the course of the trial in all groups,
consistent with the rapid accumulation of solar keratoses in adults
of this age living in a subtropical environment," wrote the
authors. "Despite this, requesting a random half of participants
to apply sunscreen daily resulted in a decrease in their average
rate of solar keratosis acquisition, especially in the first 2.5
years of the trial."
In an accompanying editorial, John L. M. Hawk,
M.D., wrote: "The study indicates yet again the great potential
value of cutaneous sunscreen application, when undertaken conscientiously
and carefully, against the now extremely well-documented ravages
of sunlight in both the short and long term."
"This splendid randomized controlled
trial is the continuation of a previous one showing sunscreen efficacy
against the development of squamous cell carcinoma. It provides
further evidence in a very large number of adults (1,621 subjects
aged 25-74 years), over a reasonably long time (2.5 years), in a
very ultraviolet-intense environment (Queensland, Australia), that
frequent, liberal applications of high-protection sunscreen by ordinary
people under normal circumstances is 25 percent more efficient against
the development of potentially premalignant actinic keratoses than
ad hoc applications."
|