Change
in technique improves accuracy of sentinel node biopsy for breast
cancer patients
A technique that has simplified identification
of the sentinel lymph node in breast cancer cases improves the accuracy
of the biopsy, according to an article in the August issue of the
journal American Surgeon. The refined technique involves injection
of radioactive tracer into sites above and adjacent to the tumor,
and it may also improve modeling of radiation fields because it detects
the small percentage of patients whose sentinel node is located in
the chest rather than the axilla.
Although a number of surgeons have switched
from random dissection of multiple axillary nodes to sentinel node
biopsy, the optimal technique for performing such a biopsy remains
controversial with multiple techniques in use, noted D. Scott Lind,
M.D., lead author of the retrospective study.
"With respect to treating breast
cancer, we have become much, much less invasive and less radical,"
said Lind. "In the last century we went from radical mastectomy
to learning that you can do breast-conserving therapy and can spare
the patient the morbidity of taking the whole breast off, with equivalent
outcomes. In the last 10 years, nearly every patient who previously
would have undergone axillary dissection undergoes sentinel node
biopsy. The problem is that's rapidly becoming the standard of care
without a standard technique. A lot of people are doing it in different
ways."
Typically, a surgeon injects a small amount
of a radioactive tracer around the patient's tumor, and then locates
the sentinel node with a hand-held device used to detect the tracer's
path. A blue dye also is injected into the breast tissue to help
visually confirm the node's location. However, surgeons continue
to debate the ideal site for tracer injection, with many surgeons
noting that it can be technically very difficult to inject the radiotracer
directly into the area of the original tumor, according to Lind.
In the current study, an American team retrospectively
studied 118 patients who were grouped into three categories based
on radiotracer injection technique: One group (65) had injection
into the skin over the tumor, 6 had injection into the breast tissue
around the tumor, and 47 had dual injection. Overall, at least one
sentinel node was identified in 98.3 percent of patients. A sentinel
node was identified in 98.5 percent of patients who received injection
in the skin above the tumor, 83.3 percent of those who received
injection around the tumor, and 100 percent of those who received
both injections.
Although the results showed that injection
into the skin overlying the area of the tumor is an accurate localizing
technique, dual injection increased the accuracy of identification
by detecting abnormal patterns of lymph fluid drainage, something
that is found in up to 20 percent of breast cancer patients, Lind
said. Practitioners then could target radiation treatments accordingly,
sparing radiation to unnecessary tissues.
The study's authors also questioned the need
for using blue dye, which is associated with rare but serious allergic
reactions. The research group has abandoned its use, although it
continues to be commonly used in the U.S.
"We found that using the two injection
sites allows us to reliably identify the sentinel node in the most
effective fashion," Lind said. "And it probably has some
advantages because we won't have to worry about patients having
reactions to blue dye, and we can identify nonaxillary sites of
disease that may affect treatment planning. This is particularly
important with the new breast cancer staging system coming out in
January, which will incorporate sentinel node results."
|