Genetic
ovarian cancers appear to have survival comparable with that for sporadic
ovarian cancers
Women with genetic ovarian cancer may not have a better survival prognosis
than women with ovarian cancer due to other mechanisms, according
to an article in the May issue of the journal Clinical Cancer Research.
Some researchers had suggested in the past that women with a mutant
form of the BRCA1 gene who develop ovarian cancer have a better survival
prognosis than women who with a normal genotype who develop ovarian
cancer.
At least 10 percent of ovarian
cancers are inherited, and many of these cases are in women with
a mutant BRCA1 allele. The current study controlled for more outcome
predictors than any of the previous studies and could not find a
measurable difference in survival due to hereditary BRCA1 dysfunction.
"Our study could not validate
previous conclusions that women with inherited ovarian cancer have
a better overall prognosis than those who have sporadic or random
ovarian cancer," said Richard Buller, M.D., Ph.D., the study's
principal investigator. "It still might be the case that hereditary
ovarian cancer offers some increased survival over other ovarian
cancers but we can't prove it with this study. Apparent survival
differences are probably due to other factors."
Buller said the findings have
implications for giving patients more accurate prognostic information.
"Based on what we've learned, I can no longer tell women that
having inherited ovarian cancer makes their prognosis better,"
he said. "The studies that would have allowed me to give that
prognosis didn't have the appropriate controls that our study does."
Previous studies had shown
an average 80 percent survival advantage for women who had hereditary
BRCA1 gene dysfunction. Buller said the recent investigation included
enough cases to have detected that 80 percent rate if it indeed
existed. "Our next step will be to try to analyze more ovarian
cancer cases. An even larger number of cases will increase our ability
to detect a smaller difference in survival, such as 30 percent,
if it exists," he said.
The current study focused on
59 cases of ovarian cancer that showed BRCA1 dysfunction due to
one of three causes --- inheriting a defective allele, mutation
but was not inherited, or a loss of gene function in the cancer
(also known as gene silencing) --- and 59 cases of ovarian cancer
in women with normal BRCA1 genotype. No previous study had controlled
for the non-inherited forms of BRCA1 dysfunction or for a mutated
p53 gene. All cases had been diagnosed, treated, or both at the
same American cancer center.
Instead of comparing the survival
rates among the groups with the three different types of BRCA1 dysfunction,
the study compared each BRCA1 group with a carefully matched control
group that did not have any BRCA1 dysfunction. For example, the
team compared women with the first type of BRCA1 dysfunction --hereditary
-- to women who were alike in every other way, such as age at diagnosis
and post-treatment condition, with the exception that genotype was
normal. The two groups had virtually identical survival rates: 4.5
years and 4.6 years (for hereditary BRCA1 defect and normal genotype,
respectively).
"We controlled for the
common outcome predicators in ovarian cancer so that we were very
careful to compare apples to apples instead of apples to oranges,"
Buller said. "You can't just take a general population of ovarian
cancer patients to study their survival. You need to consider whether
they have any BRCA1 dysfunction plus other variables that could
explain differences between groups, such as age of diagnosis, disease
stage and the amount of disease left after surgical treatment."
He noted that women with cancers
in which gene silencing is present have more tumor left after surgery
than women with a mutant BRCA1 allele, yet the difference in residual
tumor apparently is unrelated to gene dysfunction.
"If differences in survival
were caused by just a problem with the gene, then you would expect
women with mutated and silenced BRCA1 genes to have the same amount
of disease left after surgery. After all, in both cases, that gene
doesn't work," Buller said. "However, since the amount
of tumor remaining differs, some factor other than the gene may
have an influence."
Buller said that care needs
to be taken in interpreting studies, whether they support or reject
possible causes and effects. "When you interpret a study that
shows a link, such as between a genetic condition and an increased
survival rate, you need to be sure you have controlled for all the
important variables," he explained. "Likewise, when interpreting
studies that indicate a link does not exist, as with our investigation,
you must be sure that you studied enough cases not to have overlooked
any differences."
Last January, Buller and colleagues
showed that BRCA1 gene dysfunction in women with ovarian cancer
is more common than previously thought and that it frequently occurs
through ways other than inheritance. That study indicated that up
to 25 percent of women with ovarian cancer have some type of BRCA1
dysfunction. The BRCA1 gene is a tumor suppressor gene; however,
its exact function is not known.
|