Study suggests sensitivity to
symptoms of anxiety is important when choosing treatment for heart failure and
atrial fibrillation
Levels of anxiety sensitivity may be important in choosing
medical treatment for patients with heart failure and atrial fibrillation (AF),
Montreal Heart Institute researchers today told the Canadian Cardiovascular Congress
2010, co-hosted by the Heart and Stroke Foundation and the Canadian Cardiovascular
Society.
Heart and Stroke Foundation researcher and lead author Nancy Frasure-Smith,
Ph.D. explained that anxiety sensitivity is the degree to which a person is frightened
by bodily sensations and symptoms, particularly those associated with anxiety.
"For most people, sweaty palms and an increasing heart rate are simply
unpleasant symptoms that occur in stressful situations, for others these same
symptoms are interpreted as a sign of impending doom," says Dr. Frasure-Smith.
"People with high anxiety sensitivity tend to magnify the potential consequences
of their anxiety symptoms, leading to an increase in anxiety and its symptoms
in a spiraling increase of fear and worry."
While anxiety sensitivity is known to predict the occurrence of panic attacks
in cardiac and non-cardiac patients, and is associated with greater symptom preoccupation
and worse quality of life in patients with AF, it has not been previously studied
as a predictor of cardiac outcomes.
These results are based on a sub-study from the Atrial Fibrillation and Congestive
Heart Failure Trial (AF-CHF), a randomized trial of rhythm versus rate control
treatment strategies whose results were presented at the Canadian Cardiovascular
Congress in 2008. AF-CHF, which was funded by the Canadian Institutes of Health
Research, was directed by Dr. Denis Roy, cardiologist at the Montreal Heart Institute
(MHI) and vice-dean of the Université de Montréal's faculty of medicine.
Prior to randomization 933 AF-CHF study participants completed a paper and
pencil measure of anxiety sensitivity. They were then randomly placed in one of
two treatment groups: a 'rhythm' group that was treated with anti-arrhythmic medication
and cardioversion; and a 'rate' group that received medication to help keep people's
heart rates within a certain range.
Participants were followed for an average of 37 months. Results showed that,
as in the overall AF-CHF trial, the majority of patients had as good a prognosis
with the rate control strategy as with the rhythm control approach. In contrast,
patients with high anxiety sensitivity had significantly better outcomes if they
were treated with the more complicated rhythm control strategy.
"Increased emotional responses to AF symptoms in people with high anxiety
sensitivity may lead to increased levels of stress hormones making them more vulnerable
to fatal arrhythmias and worsening heart failure," says Dr. Frasure-Smith,
a researcher at the MHI, adjunct professor of psychiatry at University of Montreal
and professor of psychiatry at McGill University.
"For AF-CHF patients with high anxiety sensitivity maintenance of normal
sinus rhythm appears to be important."
"While the study - a sub analysis of a larger trial - is not definitive
in itself, it does raise interesting questions," says Heart and Stroke Foundation
spokesperson Dr. Beth Abramson. We tend to underestimate the power of the mind
in patients on powerful heart medications. Mental well being however is an important
aspect of care for all heart patients."
|