HEBE III: A single bolus of erythropoietin
does not improve cardiac function after an acute myocardial infarction
Results from the HEBE III study, a prospective, randomized,
multicentre trial performed in seven centers in the Netherlands, suggest that
the promising effects of erythropoietin seen in previous smaller studies cannot
be confirmed for the improvement of clinical outcome in patients with a first
ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI).
Myocardial infarction (MI) remains a major hazard for millions of people. Despite
improvements in treatment, the majority still ends up with reduced cardiac function,
and strategies to improve post-MI cardiac function are strongly needed. One approach,
suggested in experimental and smaller clinical studies, is the administration
of erythropoietin (EPO), currently used for the treatment of anemia caused by
renal disease. The HEBE III study was designed to study the effects of a single
intravenous bolus of EPO on clinical outcome in patients with a first ST-elevation
MI. The primary endpoint of the trial - as a measure of cardiac function - was
left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) after six weeks, with secondary endpoints
assessed according to infarct size and major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE).
The trial was conducted in 529 randomized STEMI patients and headline results
showed that this single IV bolus of EPO did not improve cardiac function. However,
patients who received EPO had fewer major cardiac events, such as heart failure,
compared with the control group.
The HEBE III trial studied the effect of a single bolus of 60,000 IU epoetin
alfa on LVEF. EPO was administered intravenously within three hours after a successful
PCI for a first STEMI. The study aimed to find a 3% increase of LVEF in patients
treated with EPO compared to standard care. In total, 529 patients were included
in the study, in which 263 patients were assigned to the EPO group and 266 to
the control group.
After six weeks, LVEF was 53% in the EPO group and 52% in the control group,
but this 1% difference was too small to be statistically or clinically significant.
Furthermore, infarct size, measured by proteins in the blood, was also not significantly
different between the two groups. However, in the EPO group, only eight patients
suffered a major cardiac adverse event, compared to 19 in the control group.
Commenting on the results, principal investigator Dr. Adriaan Voors from the
University Medical Center, Groningen, the Netherlands, said: "The promising
effects of erythropoietin in previous smaller studies could not be confirmed in
this large clinical trial. The reduction of major cardiac effects is of interest,
but, since the study was not primarily designed to reduce cardiac effects, and
the numbers are small, we should be careful with its interpretation. Larger clinical
trials powered to detect a reduction in hard clinical endpoints should be performed
before EPO can be routinely used in patients with an acute heart attack."
The HEBE III study was presented at a Hotline session at the ESC Congress 2010
and published concurrently in the European Heart Journal.
The HEBE III study was funded by the Interuniversity Cardiology Institute of
the Netherlands (ICIN) with additional unrestricted grants from Janssen-Cilag,
the Netherlands, and BRAHMS AG, Germany.
|