HeartMate II: Continuous flow left ventricular
assist device improves survival more than pulsatile type in end-stage heart failure
A new, continuous flow heart pump, or left ventricular
assist device (LVAD), delivered better two-year survival in advanced heart failure
patients than the current pulsatile model, researchers reported in a late-breaking
clinical trial presentation at the American Heart Association's Scientific Sessions
2009.
In the HeartMate II Destination Therapy Trial, researchers
tested a new device that helped heart failure patients who weren't responding
to optimal medical therapy and weren't eligible for a heart transplant. They found
significant improvement in outcomes of patients who received the continuous flow
LVAD (HeartMate II) compared to those who received a pulsatile flow LVAD (HeartMate
XVE), the only FDA-approved device for treating such patients.
"The results of this trial will alter the manner in which
we provide mechanical circulatory support," said Joseph G. Rogers, M.D., co-author
of the study and medical director of the Duke Heart Failure Program at Duke University
Medical Center in Durham, N.C. "In the past, mechanical pumps delivered blood
in a pulsatile manner; in other words, they beat like a human heart.
"The newer pump is smaller, operates quietly and has
demonstrated superior durability. Interestingly, it also pumps blood continuously,
which reduces the systolic blood pressure. We believe that in the future there
will be little need for pulsatile blood pumps."
The study included 200 end-stage heart failure patients
implanted at 38 U.S. medical centers between March 2005 and May 2007. All patients
had failed optimal medical therapy and were ineligible for a heart transplant.
The primary endpoint was survival free from disabling
stroke and device failure requiring re-operation at two years. Secondary endpoints
included overall survival, adverse events, quality of life and functional capacity.
A greater proportion of continuous flow LVAD patients
successfully reached the primary composite end-point compared to pulsatile flow
(46 percent vs. 11 percent) -a highly significant finding, researchers said.
At one-year follow-up, 68 percent of the continuous flow
LVAD patients had survived compared to 55 percent in the pulsatile flow group.
At two years, survival was 58 percent for the continuous flow device vs. 24 percent
with the pulsatile device.
Both groups experienced early and sustained improvements
in their quality of life scores and functional capacity. The distance walked in
six minutes (a common measure of functional abilities) increased from 182 to 318
meters in the continuous flow patients and from 172 to 306 meters in the pulsatile
flow patients at one year, Rogers said.
Over the 24 months of the study, the rate of disabling
stroke was similar in both study arms (11 percent for continuous flow LVAD vs.
12 percent for pulsatile flow LVAD).
In addition, 10 percent of the patients who received
the continuous flow LVAD needed surgery to repair or replace the pump compared
to 36 percent of patients with the pulsatile device.
Furthermore, other adverse events were less common in
the continuous flow pump group than in the pulsatile one.
"Severe heart failure is associated with a very poor
prognosis," Rogers said. "Patients diagnosed with advanced heart failure treated
with optimal medical therapy have a 10 percent to 20 percent survival rate in
the ensuing two years. Further, these patients are unlikely to experience significant
improvement in their quality of life or functional abilities with routine medical
or electrical therapies."
Transplantation is a standard treatment for patients with advanced heart failure.
But an estimated 150,000 U.S. patients have advanced
heart failure while the number of heart donors each year is about 2,100. "We believe
that with improved technology and management strategies, LVADs will fill this
important gap," Rogers said.
Thoratec Corporation, in Pleasanton, Calif., funded the
study.
Co-authors are: Mark S. Slaughter, M.D.; Carmelo A. Milano,
M.D.; Stuart D. Russell, M.D.; John V. Conte, M.D.; David Feldman, M.D., Ph.D.;
Benjamin Sun, M.D.; Antone J. Tatooles, M.D.; Reynolds M. Delgado, M.D.; James
W. Long, M.D., Ph.D.; Steven C. Horton, M.D.; Thomas C .Wozniak, M.D.; Waqas Ghumann,
M.D.; David J. Farrar, Ph.D.; and Howard Frazier, M.D.
Disclosures: Dr. Rogers has served as a consultant for
Thoratec.
|