ARBITER 6-HALTS: In patients on
statins, raising HDL with niacin decreases carotid intima-media thickness more
effectively than reducing LDL with ezetimibe
In combination with statins, adding a medication that
raises high-density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol was more effective in reversing
artery wall plaque buildup and in reducing heart disease risk than adding a drug
that lowers low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol, researchers reported today
at the American Heart Association Scientific Sessions 2009.
In the study titled The Effect of Extended-release Niacin
or Ezetimibe Added to Chronic Statin Therapy On Carotid Intima Media Thickness
(ARBITER 6-HALTS), researchers found:
- Adding the cholesterol drug niacin to a statin improved HDL cholesterol levels
and significantly reduced arterial plaque buildup within 8 months, with further
improvement seen at the end of the study (14 months).
- A second approach, adding ezetimibe to a statin, lowered LDL cholesterol
to a greater extent, but did not raise HDL. With it, there was no overall effect
on arterial build up in the neck arteries.
- With ezetimibe, greater reductions in LDL cholesterol paradoxically were
associated with more arterial buildup, a result opposite to that expected.
- The incidence of major cardiovascular events such as fatal and non-fatal
heart attack was higher in the ezetimibe group as compared to the niacin group
(5 percent vs. 1 percent).
HDL And LDL Treatment Strategies (HALTS) was a prospective,
randomized, parallel group, open-label, blinded endpoint study conducted at Walter
Reed Army Medical Center in Washington, D.C., and Washington Adventist Hospital
in Tacoma Park, Md. It included 363 adults (80 percent male, average age 68 years)
with or at high risk for atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease.
All participants were on cholesterol-lowering statin
drugs, and their LDL cholesterol was at the treatment goal of under 100 milligrams
per deciliter (mg/dL) of blood. Their HDL cholesterol was lower than 50 mg/dL
for men and 55 mg/dL for women.
The researchers randomly assigned the subjects to receive
either niacin or ezetimibe in addition to their usual statin. The primary endpoint
was the change in the wall thickness of the carotid artery in the neck between
the two groups of patients. In June, researchers halted the trial early because
the primary endpoint was met. Specifically, 14-month follow-up data on 208 patients
showed that in the niacin group, average HDL cholesterol rose from 42 mg/dL to
50 mg/dL and there was a significant regression in artery wall thickness. In the
ezetimibe group, average LDL cholesterol levels dropped from 83 mg/dL to 66 mg/dL;
however no overall change was found in average artery wall thickness.
“These findings for ezetimibe are counter to the prevailing
understanding of LDL cholesterol - that lowering LDL cholesterol results in slowing
of the atherosclerotic process as has been convincingly shown for other classes
of lipid modifying drugs, such as statins and bile acid resins,” said Allen J.
Taylor, M.D. FAHA, principal investigator of the study and director of Advanced
Cardiovascular Imaging and the Lipid/Prevention Clinic in the Department of Medicine
(Cardiology) at Washington Hospital Center in Washington, D.C.
In earlier studies demonstrating the protective effects
of statins, researchers found strong associations between LDL cholesterol reduction
and the prevention of cardiovascular disease. Consequently, many people now view
LDL cholesterol reduction as a way to measure whether a treatment will be useful.
But HALTS researchers’ findings “challenge the use of
LDL reduction as a guaranteed surrogate for clinical performance, particularly
for new clinical compounds, and in this particular case, ezetimibe,” Taylor said.
Patients should know their HDL numbers and, if they are low, ask their doctors
if adding a treatment such as niacin is right for them once their LDL is treated
to goal with a statin drug, he said.
Co-authors are: Todd C. Villines, M.D.; Patrick J. Devine,
M.D.; Mark Turco, M.D.; Len Griffen, M.D.; Michael Miller, M.D.; Eric J Stanek,
Pharm. D.; and Neil J Weissman, M.D.
Study sponsor: Abbott Inc. (initially Kos Pharmaceuticals,
Inc., Cranbury, N.J.) provided an unrestricted, investigator-initiated research
grant administered by the Henry M. Jackson Foundation for the Advancement of Military
Medicine in Rockville, Md. The investigators were solely responsible for all aspects
of the study and the final decisions on manuscript content.
Disclosures: Dr. Taylor reports receiving lecture fees
from Abbott. Dr. Turco reports receiving consulting and lecture fees from Abbott
Cardiovascular. Dr. Miller reports receiving lecture fees and grant support from
Merck-Schering Plough. Dr. Villines reports receiving lecture fees from Novartis
Pharmaceuticals. Dr. Devine reports receiving consulting fees from Medacorp, MDLinx,
and Guidpoint Global, equity ownership in Evergreen solar, Openwave, Unifi, Novavax,
Genaera Pharm, and Generex Biotech. Dr. Stanek is senior director of research
in Personalized Medicine Research and Development at Medco Health Solutions, Inc.
(Franklin Lakes, N.J.), but all work performed on this trial was independent of
this relationship. No other potential conflict of interest was reported.
|