REVERSE: Biventricular pacing combined with optimal medical therapy is beneficial in patients with mild heart failure
A 24-month European study measuring cardiac resynchronization
therapy (CRT) showed that using a biventricular pacemaker combined with drug therapy
on patients with mild heart failure and ventricular dyssynchrony showed the magnitude
of worsening at measured time points was significantly lower than in the control
group who received optimal medical therapy alone, according to research presented
at the American College of Cardiology's 58th annual scientific session.
Worsening is defined as either the occurrence of heart
failure hospitalizations, death, the need to be programmed to the opposite randomization
assignment, worse New York Heart Association (NYHA) functional class or worse
wellbeing as judged by the patient.
This study is a multi-national European cohort of the
REVERSE trial presented at ACC08 which was a one-year multi-center trial that
gauged whether CRT plus optimal medical therapy (CRT ON) can manage the progression
of heart failure compared to optimal medical therapy alone (CRT OFF). The results
from that earlier one-year study, which included both United States and European
patients, failed to show that adding CRT to optimal medical therapy significantly
influenced the primary end point, which was percent worsening. However, the data
did show that device therapy most likely improved left ventricular function and
prevented heart-failure hospitalizations ? both secondary endpoints of the study.
"We wanted to assess if CRT in medically well-treated
but mildly symptomatic patients or in asymptomatic patients with previous heart
failure and with a wide QRS could modify disease progression," said Cecilia Linde,
M.D., Ph.D, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden.
The primary endpoint of comparing the worsening percentage
in both CRT ON and CRT OFF increased over time, indicating disease progression
did not stop. However, the magnitude of worsening at each time point was significantly
lower in the CRT ON when compared to the CRT OFF group.
Improvement in left ventricular function was marked and
progressed over 18 months with sustained benefit over the last six months of the
study period. In contrast, the disease progression, being worsening ventricular
function, in the CRT OFF group was seen towards the end of the observation period.
"We noticed that the 262 European patients improved by
CRT, regarding the clinical composite response and in terms of sustained reverse
remodeling," Linde said. "This translates into a significant decrease in death
and heart failure hospitalizations."
As with the main REVERSE trial, there was no significant
benefit in the NYHA functional classification, quality of life or exercise capacity,
which is not surprising in mildly symptomatic or asymptomatic patients.
"Optimal heart failure medication, when properly introduced,
means that patients who are admitted for heart failure for the first time may
revert to an asymptomatic or mildly symptomatic stage," Linde said.
Left ventricular function does not normalize or improve
sufficiently by administering drugs in all patients. In these patients, disease
progression that results in worsening symptoms or even the need for hospitalization
due to heart failure over the following 12 to 24 months is expected.
"Our study demonstrated that CRT in a subset of such
patients with wide QRS easily detected with an ordinary ECG and indicating delayed
ventricular activation, is an important addition to treatment that achieves substantial
reverse modeling, which postpones the time to the next heart failure progression,"
Linde said. "Thus, we believe it impacts disease progression."
|