PERISCOPE trial finds no progression of coronary plaque with pioglitazone therapy but significant progression over time with glimepiride
Pioglitazone appears to be the first diabetes therapy
able to reduce progression of coronary atherosclerosis in patients with type 2
diabetes, according to a late-breaking clinical trial presented at the meeting
of the American College of Cardiology.
The PERISCOPE trial (Pioglitazone Effect on Regression of Intravascular Sonographic
Coronary Obstruction Prospective Evaluation) compared two approaches to management
of diabetes, randomizing 543 patients for 18 months to the thiazolidinedione pioglitazone,
which reduces blood glucose level by increasing insulin sensitivity or the sulfonylurea
glimepiride, which lowers blood glucose by stimulating insulin release by the
pancreas).
The prospective, randomized, multicenter, double-blind trial treated patients
with coronary disease and type 2 diabetes for 18 months at 97 academic and community
hospitals in North and South America. Patients underwent intravascular ultrasonography
to measure the amount of plaque volume at entry. Patients received either glimepiride,
1-to-4 mg, or pioglitazone, 15-to-45 mg, titrated to maximum dosage, if tolerated.
After 18 months, a second ultrasound examination was performed to determine the
amount of change in coronary plaque volume. The primary endpoint was the rate
of progression of coronary plaque as measured by the ultrasound procedure.
The principal finding was an absence of progression of coronary plaque with
pioglitazone (negative 0.16 percent) compared with highly significant progression
with glimepiride (positive 0.73 percent) as assessed with intravascular ultrasound.
There were also major differences between treatments in biochemical effects
including marked differences in levels of high-density lipoprotein cholesterol,
triglycerides and C-reactive protein. Other important endpoints included changes
in glycohemoglobin levels, insulin levels, other lipid parameters and blood pressure
- all more favorable for patients treated with pioglitazone.
There were adverse effects in both treatment groups: More patients assigned
to glimepiride experienced episodes of low blood sugar or angina and more patients
assigned to pioglitazone experienced edema and fractures.
"Atherosclerosis can be particularly aggressive in patients with diabetes,
which is currently increasing at an alarming rate in the developed and developing
world," said Steven Nissen, MD, Chairman, Department of Cardiovascular Medicine,
Cleveland Clinic and lead author. "By defining the optimal strategy for managing
coronary heart disease in this patient population, this study has major implications
for how we will treat diabetics with coronary disease in the future."
|