APEX AMI Trial suggests anti-inflammatory therapy with pexelizumab fails to improve outcome in patients receiving angioplasty for acute myocardial infarction
Anti-inflammatory therapy with the experimental drug
pexelizumab does not improve morbidity or mortality compared with standard treatment
in the 30 days after angioplasty for acute myocardial infarction, according to
a late-breaking clinical trial presented at the American Heart Association meeting.
The Assessment of PEXelizumab in Acute Myocardial Infarction
(APEX AMI) Study involved 5,745 patients and was the largest ever done involving
percutaneous coronary intervention following acute ST-elevation heart attack (STEMI),
said Paul W. Armstrong, M.D., chair of the study and director of the Canadian
VIGOUR Centre, professor of medicine at the University of Alberta and a cardiologist
at University Hospital in Alberta, Canada.
The patients (average age, 61 years; 77 percent men)
were treated at more than 296 medical centers in 17 countries. They were randomized
to one dose of pexelizumab or placebo at 2 milligrams per kilogram body weight
(mg/kg) for 10 minutes prior to the procedure, followed by an intravenous dose
(0.05 mg/kg per hour) of drug or placebo during the following 24 hours.
For the primary endpoint of 30-day all-cause death, 3.92
percent of placebo patients had died compared to 4.06 percent of pexelizumab patients.
A secondary endpoint was the combination of death, congestive heart failure or
shock. The 30-day risk for the composite endpoint was 9.19 percent for placebo
and 8.99 percent for pexelizumab.
Researchers also found no evidence of subgroup benefits
based on time, age, gender, infarct location, or Killip Class. Killip Class is
a classification system used in individuals with an acute heart attack to identify
their risk level. Individuals with a low Killip class are less likely to die within
the first 30 days after their heart attack than individuals with a high Killip
Class.
“Smaller studies found that the drug could have reduced
death by as much as two thirds although these estimates were imprecise,” Armstrong
said. “It now appears that chance may have been a factor in the previous studies.
In addition, the low placebo event rate (3.92 percent) may have hindered the ability
to detect a treatment effect in this trial.”
Researchers said they had anticipated an event rate of
6.5 percent for that group.
Researchers also had some indications that standard care
has improved since earlier studies addressed this question. For instance, patients
who qualify for angioplasty seem to be getting it sooner based on unexpectedly
low average times to intervention in this study. In addition, 36 percent of patients
in this study were transferred from one medical facility to another to receive
their procedure, indicating that angioplasty was applied to a broad cross section
of patients.
“Despite the benefits of percutaneous coronary intervention
in reopening blocked arteries, this intervention can lead to problems of its own,”
Armstrong said. “This collateral damage, called reperfusion injury, is thought
to occur through the body’s inflammatory and immune system response, which is
what pexelizumab was designed to affect.”
|