Roughly nine of ten patients who survive acute Type A aortic dissection will survive for at least three years after hospitalization
Roughly 90 percent of patients who survive emergency
surgery and hospitalization for Type A aortic dissection will survive at least
three years, and patients without pre-existing cardiovascular problems are even
more likely to survive, according to an article in a supplement to the July 4
issue of Circulation. The study, which was performed by an international team,
involved data from patients. who were treated in the late 1990s and early 2000s
for Type A dissection.
“Clearly, this is one of those diseases where if you
catch it early you can save lives in the hospital, and with successful surgery
your outlook after discharge can look quite good,” said lead author Thomas Tsai,
MD, a cardiovascular research fellow at the University of Michigan Medical School.
“Of course, those who do survive will have a diagnosis for life of aortic disease,
and will need medication and aggressive monitoring of their aorta.”
Tsai and senior author Kim Eagle, MD, conducted the research
with colleagues from the International Registry of Aortic Dissection, or IRAD,
using data on patients treated at 21 medical centers in 11 countries.
“Aortic dissection is still very much a lethal health
crisis, with mortality approaching 2 percent per hour. But these results show
we’re doing a pretty good job in helping patients after they weather the storm
of diagnosis and surgery,” said Eagle.
The new study drew its patients from a group of 885 Type
A aortic dissection patients who came or were transferred to participating centers.
Nearly 30 percent of patients died in the hospital, but long-term follow-up data
were available on many of the 617 who left the hospital after surgical or non-surgical
treatment. The patients included in the final analysis were treated at eight centers
that had compiled long-term follow-up data on most of their patients.
Roughly 90 percent of the 303 patients in the study had
surgery; the rest received medical treatment because of advanced age, pre-existing
conditions that made surgery too risky, or patients’ refusal to have surgery.
Death rates were much higher among the non-surgical patients.
The average age of all patients was 59 years, but a quarter
of patients were over age 70 years ? reflecting the fact that aortic dissection
can strike relatively young patients with genetic diseases such as Marfan syndrome.
Almost three quarters (72 percent) of patients in the
study had hypertension before their dissection. Nearly 25 percent had atherosclerosis,
and just under 13 percent had had some sort of prior cardiovascular surgery.
These underlying problems appear to have had a big impact
on patients’ risk of dying after leaving the hospital. In fact, patients who had
atherosclerosis or previous cardiovascular surgery had twice the risk of dying
in the three-year follow-up period as patients without these characteristics.
“What predicts an aortic dissection patient’s death after hospitalization are
the risk factors they came in with,” said Tsai.
Tsai and Eagle noted that the good news of the new result
may have a lot to do with recent advances in emergency diagnosis, surgical and
anesthesiology techniques, and intensive-care practices, as well as better post-hospital
care of patients using drugs and regular medical imaging. Because IRAD has collected
data on so many patients treated within a seven-year period, the study probably
better reflects modern treatment of the condition compared with other studies
that compiled data from patients treated over several decades.
The consortium of researchers are currently developing
tests that would examine DNA or blood to screen high-risk people or the relatives
of dissection patients, to make a rapid diagnosis in the emergency room, or to
add to long-term monitoring of survivors. Better screening for aneurysms in the
aorta, which are involved in a large percentage of dissections, could also help
nip more dissections in very early stages.
|