Even slight reductions in the delay
to deliver emergency angioplasty can improve survival of patients with acute myocardial
infarction
Even slight reductions in the delay to deliver emergency
angioplasty improves survival of all patients with acute myocardial infarction,
regardless of the interval between onset of symptoms and hospital arrival, according
to an article in the June 6 issue of the Journal of the American College of Cardiology.
“There is a belief among some clinicians that patients
presenting late will not benefit from faster door-to-balloon time. We were able
to show that door-to-balloon time matters for all patients regardless of time
to presentation.
Furthermore, we were able to show that door-to-balloon
time mattered for both low- and high-risk patients. In summary, all patients can
benefit from shorter door-to-balloon times,” said Robert L. McNamara, MD, MHS,
lead author, of the Yale University School of Medicine.
Previously it was not clear whether patients who had
had symptoms for a few hours before reaching the hospital benefited from making
every effort to minimize time from presentation to catheterization lab.
The current analysis used data from a US registry in
which hospitals voluntarily enter information about patients with myocardial infarction.
In particular, researchers analyzed data on 29,222 patients treated with angioplasty
from 1999 to 2002 at 395 hospitals within six hours of alerting health care providers
to their symptoms.
Overall, when patients underwent angioplasty within 90
minutes of hospital arrival, there was 3 percent in-hospital mortality. In-hospital
mortality rate rose to 7.4 percent for patients who were in the hospital for more
than 3 hours before being treated.
Analysis of subgroups who arrived at a hospital within
an hour of reporting symptoms, between one and two hours, or longer than two hours,
showed the same pattern: within each subgroup, faster action in the hospital meant
lower death rates. The same benefits of swift hospital response were seen regardless
of whether patients were high-risk or not.
The results of this study indicate that while getting
to the hospital as quickly as possible is vital, rapid action by the hospital
makes just as much of a difference for patients who come in late as it does for
those who arrive close to onset of symptoms.
“I think the most surprising finding is that mortality
decreases with shorter door-to-balloon time to a similar degree for each group,
regardless of time to presentation. Many clinicians think that time matters much
more for early presenters than for late ones,” McNamara said.
Jeffrey J. Cavendish, MD, from the Naval Medical Center
in San Diego, California, who was not connected with this study, said the results
emphasize the importance of streamlining hospital procedures: “The main message
that this study re-enforces is not only the concept of "time is muscle,"
but that "time is life.”
|