Updated WISE Study data provide descriptions of the macrovascular and microvascular dysfunction that characterizes ischemic heart disease in women
Updated results from the Women’s Ischemia
Syndrome Evaluation (WISE) Study suggest that it is vital to identify
affected women because their ischemic disease often evades detection
with traditional diagnostics and remains undiagnosed until it has
reached a critical stage, according to a supplement of the February
7 issue of the Journal of the American College of Cardiology.
The major gender difference was described with “Functional rather
than structural abnormalities of the coronary circulation may be
the hallmark of the disease in women,” in a comparison of the typical
male obstructive arterial lesion with the two major areas of dysfunction
in women: in the coronary endothelium and in the cardiac microcirculation.
C. Noel Bairey Merz, MD, chairs the WISE study, which was launched
in 1996. WISE was designed to study diagnostic testing and pathophysiology
of ischemic heart disease in women and how sex hormones and other
gender-specific findings influence clinical aspects of the disease.
From 1996 to 2000, 936 women referred for angiograms because of
chest pain and suspected ischemia were enrolled.
In the supplement, Merz and her fellow WISE researchers offer the
first description of a female-specific vascular disorder, “a global
pattern of dysfunction in the macro- and microcirculation.”
The supplement articles on WISE studies, accompanied by discussions
by several experts in the field, provide insight on a wide variety
of subjects, including the array of gender-specific factors contributing
to women’s manifestation of heart disease and implications for innovative
diagnostic and evaluation procedures.
One area of focus was the major roles of sex hormones in women.
High estrogen levels before menopause and decreasing estrogen and
progesterone levels after menopause are believed to influence ischemic
heart disease in women.
Premenopausal estrogen deficiency due to ovarian dysfunction may
be a significant risk factor for younger women. Women with disruption
of ovulation and decreased estrogen production have a greatly increased
risk of coronary artery disease.
Because women’s diffuse atherosclerosis is far less likely to
be imaged with traditional catheterization, the researchers recommend
use of nuclear-based heart studies. Nuclear SPECT (single-photon
emission computed tomography) imaging, for example, has resulted
in dramatic improvement in diagnostic accuracy for women.
Although functional capacity is one of the strongest estimators
of cardiac prognosis, treadmill stress testing is not suitable or
effective for many women. Tests that induce stress chemically should
be considered. Also, a 12-item questionnaire, the Duke Activity
Status Index (DASI), provides a valuable risk assessment using self-reported
activities of daily living.
These are translated into METs (metabolic equivalents), which
are used to approximate physical work capacity. Two thirds of the
cardiac events in the WISE women occurred in those with an estimated
capacity of less than 4.7 METs. Women with evidence of lower scores
were also significantly more likely to have risk factors and obstructive
coronary artery disease.
Although overweight women are more likely than normal-weight women
to have coronary artery disease risk factors, researchers found
that metabolic alterations associated with obesity are key factors
in placing a woman at risk for coronary artery disease and cardiac
events. Women with metabolic syndrome are at much higher risk of
cardiac events than those with normal metabolic status. Metabolic
syndrome includes insulin resistance, unhealthy cholesterol and/or
triglyceride levels, hypertension, and abdominal obesity.
This new reinforcement of the realization that there are different,
unique risk factors for ischemic heart disease in women ? such as
inflammatory processes in the arteries, anemia, and microvascular
dysfunction ? leads to the possibility that different diagnostic
and prognostic tools may be employed.
Among options currently being evaluated are high-sensitivity C-reactive
protein, hemoglobin monitoring, and retinal artery narrowing examinations
and coronary calcification tests.
|