Magnetic resonance imaging is better than computed tomography for detection of hemorrhagic transformation of an acute ischemic stroke
Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) may be more
accurate than computed tomography (CT) in detecting bleeding in
acute stroke and more accurate in revealing chronic bleeding such
as hemorrhagic transformation of an ischemic stroke, according to
a study in the October 20th issue of the Journal of the American
Medical Association.
Noncontrast CT has been the standard brain imaging technique used
for initial evaluation of patients with acute stroke symptoms, largely
due to its capacity to rule out the presence of hemorrhage, according
to background information in the article. MRI has been suggested
as an alternative to CT in an emergency department setting because
of its ability to outline the presence, size, location, and extent
of hyperacute ischemia.
Chelsea S. Kidwell, MD, and her American colleagues examined MRI
and CT scans in 200 patients showing signs of stroke in order to
compare accuracy in detecting acute hemorrhage. The average age
of patients was 75 years, with 55 percent women. MRI and CT scans
were performed within six hours of symptom onset.
Researchers stopped the study early after an unplanned interim
analysis revealed that MRI was detecting acute bleeding not detected
by CT. In diagnosing any type of bleeding, MRI identified 71 positive
patients, while CT identified 29 positive patients. Acute bleeding
was diagnosed in 25 participants on both MRI and CT, with 4 additional
patients identified in MRI scans not found in corresponding CT.
Chronic bleeding, most often microbleeds, was visualized on 49 patient
MRIs, although not on their CT scans.
The authors wrote: “… MRI may be able to detect regions of hemorrhagic
transformation of an acute ischemic stroke not evident on CT. Our
study confirms the superiority of MRI for detection of chronic hemorrhage,
particularly microbleeds. The role of these findings in the decision-making
process for treatment of patients who are candidates for thrombolytic
[clot-dissolving] therapy is currently unknown.”
They concluded by saying: “… MRI may be acceptable as the sole
imaging technique for acute stroke at centers with expertise in
interpreting these findings.”
|