Levels of apolipoprotein B may be more strongly linked with some risk factors for heart disease than low-density lipoprotein cholesterol
Apolipoprotein B may be more strongly linked
to several heart disease risk factors than low-density lipoprotein
cholesterol, according to an article in the October 28th rapid access
issue of Circulation.
U.S. practice guidelines recommend therapy
to reduce risk based on blood levels of low-density lipoprotein
cholesterol. The current study, which is the first to explore both
low-density lipoprotein cholesterol and apolipoprotein B in an ethnically
diverse population, indicates that apolipoprotein B may be a better
predictor of risk for cardiovascular disease, according to lead
author Steven Haffner, M.D.
Current cholesterol tests measure low-density
lipoprotein cholesterol indirectly, by measuring the cholesterol
portion of the low-density particle rather than its protein portion.
This does not actually assess the size or number of low-density
lipoprotein particles. However, measurement of apolipoprotein B
indicates the concentration of particles in the blood, and this
may be a better measure for risk.
The researchers examined 1,522 people in the
Insulin Resistance Atherosclerosis Study, which examined links between
abnormal glucose metabolism and the development of cardiovascular
disease. All participants had high levels of triglycerides.
Participants were divided into several groups
according to their low-density lipoprotein and apolipoprotein B
levels. All subjects were examined for a range of cardiovascular
disease risk factors such as abdominal obesity, C-reactive protein,
fibrinogen and plasminogen activator inhibitor-1, insulin concentration,
and thickness of the carotid artery walls.
Of the people studied, 942 met criteria for
treatment based on low-density lipoprotein cholesterol levels. In
that group, 85 percent (801 people) also had elevated levels of
apolipoprotein B. Of the 580 participants who did not fit the low-density
lipoprotein profile for treatment, 25 percent (147 people) had elevated
levels of apoplipoprotein B, findings that were consistent across
ethnic groups (primarily Caucasian and African Americans).
In the article, the authors addressed concerns
regarding the 288 people in the study (19 percent) who would have
had a different treatment recommendation if apolipoprotein B were
used to guide treatment--- especially the 147 people with normal
low-density lipoprotein levels but elevated apolipoprotein B levels.
These 147 participants were more likely to
have abdominal obesity, high blood insulin levels and clotting factors
than were participants with high levels of low-density lipoprotein
LDL and normal levels of apolipoprotein B, all three traits contributors
to metabolic syndrome.
“These patients don’t just have a cholesterol
problem, they have an insulin-glucose metabolism problem,” said
coauthor Allan D. Sniderman, M.D. “This is the first study to my
knowledge that ties the abnormal insulin-glucose metabolism to high
triglycerides with high apoB.”
Sniderman noted that low-density lipoprotein
is still an important marker for heart disease risk. “We are not
proposing that we should throw out low-density lipoprotein cholesterol
testing. But we’re going beyond low-density lipoprotein cholesterol
and we’re getting more precise. The question is which parameter
should you rely on: the one that tells you the most (apolipoprotein
B) or the one that you’ve been using the longest (low-density lipoprotein
cholesterol).”
Measurement of apolipoprotein B may also be
a good way to determine whether cholesterol-lowering drugs are working.
The test is now standardized, accurate, inexpensive, and does not
require fasting, as does the low-density lipoprotein cholesterol
test.
Although the American Heart Association
does not currently recommend testing for apolipoprotein B, Canada
recommended testing in its national guidelines about 2 years ago
and is currently updating the country’s guidelines for lipids and
diabetes to include testing for apolipoprotein B.
|