Implantable
pacemaker-defibrillators improve quality of life and exercise capacity
in patients with heart failure Patients
with moderate to severe heart failure see improved functional status,
exercise capacity, and quality of life with implantable devices
that combine cardiac resynchronization therapy and cardioverter
defibrillator functions, according to a study in the May 28th issue
of The Journal of the American Medical Association.
James B. Young, M.D., and his colleagues in
the Multicenter InSync ICD Randomized Clinical Evaluation (MIRACLE
ICD) trial examined the efficacy and safety of combined cardiac
resynchronization therapy and implantable cardioverter defibrillator
therapy in patients with advanced congestive heart failure.
The study was a randomized, double-blind trial
conducted from October 1999 to August 2001 that involved 369 patients
at high risk of life-threatening ventricular arrhythmias and with
New York Heart Association class III or IV heart failure (328 and
41 patients, respectively) despite optimized medical treatment.
All patients received devices with combined
capabilities, with 182 serving as controls (cardioverter defibrillator
activated, resynchronization off) and 187 in the cardioverter defibrillator/
dual-function group (cardioverter defibrillator and resynchronization
activated).
At 6 months, patients assigned to the dual-function
group had a greater improvement in average quality of life score
and functional class than controls. However, there was no difference
in the change in distance walked in 6 minutes. There was a greater
increase in peak oxygen consumption in the dual-function group than
in controls. No significant differences were observed in changes
in left ventricular size or function, overall heart failure status,
survival, and rates of hospitalization. The capability to terminate
an abnormal heart rhythm was not impaired.
The authors conclude, "cardiac resynchronization
therapy without interfering with cardioverter defibrillator functions
improved the quality of life, functional capacity, and cardiopulmonary
exercise test performance of patients with moderate to severe heart
failure ... and life-threatening ventricular arrhythmias. These
therapeutic effects were observed in the context of appropriate
preexistent and continuing vigorous medical management of these
patients."
In an accompanying editorial, David
J. Bradley, M.D., Ph.D., wrote, "The MIRACLE ICD trial is an
important step forward in understanding the role of device therapy
for heart failure. History shows that when 2 beneficial therapies
are combined, unanticipated outcomes and even harm can occur. In
the case of these devices, however, MIRACLE ICD demonstrates that,
for a selected group of patients with heart failure, treatment with
these devices can improve quality of life and functional class without
compromising cardioverter defibrillator function. Ongoing and future
studies will refine and possibly expand the indications for this
promising therapy."
|