Carvedilol use among patients
with severe chronic heart failure does not increase risk for initial
serious side effects and does improve survival, according to study
results published in the February 12th issue of The Journal of the
American Medical Association.
According to background information in the article, beta-blockers
remain underused in this patient population despite their established
effectiveness in improving outcome in heart failure. Concerns that
the early phase of treatment produces few immediate benefits and
may have important risks (such as symptomatic hypotension during
the first 4 to 8 weeks of therapy) may be partly the cause for avoidance
of beta-blockers by some physicians.
Henry Krum, M.B., and his Australian team reported findings from
the Carvedilol Prospective Randomized Cumulative Survival (COPERNICUS)
study. One of the trial’s objectives was to evaluate early effects
of the beta-blocker in patients with severe heart failure. In the
overall study (mean follow-up, 10.4 months), carvedilol reduced
the risk of death by 35 percent compared with placebo. This trial
focused on patients with severe heart failure who might be expected
to have the greatest difficulty starting treatment with a beta-blocker.
The study was a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial
conducted from October 1997 to March 2000 at 334 hospital centers
in 21 countries: A total of 2,289 patients with symptoms of heart
failure at rest or with minimal exertion who were clinically euvolemic
and had a left ventricular ejection fraction of less than 25 percent
participated in the trial.
Patients were randomly assigned to receive carvedilol, started
at 3.125 mg twice daily with up titration to a target dosage of
25 mg twice daily (1,156 patients), or to placebo (1,133 patients)
in addition to their usual medications for heart failure.
The researchers wrote "The carvedilol group experienced no
increase in cardiovascular risk but instead had fewer patients who
died (19 versus 25); who died or were hospitalized (134 versus 153);
or who died, were hospitalized, or were permanently withdrawn from
treatment (162 versus 188)."
These effects were similar in direction and magnitude to those observed
during the entire study, and they were apparent particularly in
patients with a very depressed left ventricular ejection fraction.
"Differences in favor of carvedilol became apparent as early
as 14 to 21 days following initiation of treatment. Worsening heart
failure was the only serious adverse event with a frequency greater
than 2 percent and was reported with similar frequency in the placebo
and carvedilol groups (6.4 percent versus 5.1 percent)."
"During both initiation and up titration, patients treated
with carvedilol had no increase in the risk of worsening heart failure,
pulmonary edema, cardiogenic shock, or other serious adverse cardiovascular
events, including death," they wrote. "If concerns about
efficacy and safety during the initiation of beta-blocker therapy
have caused physicians to deny or delay the use of these drugs,
our findings should provide the reassurance needed to encourage
the high levels of use that are warranted by the results of clinical
trials."
In an accompanying editorial, Sergio L. Pinski, M.D., wrote that
"congestive heart failure will continue to be an increasing
public health problem for the foreseeable future: The lifetime risk
of developing heart failure has been recently estimated at 1 in
5. Although therapeutic progress has accelerated in the last few
years, its implementation in the community has been slower."
"Both beta-blockers and cardiac resynchronization improve
well-being and prolong life in patients with severe congestive heart
failure due to left ventricular systolic dysfunction," Pinski
wrote. "Hopefully, dissemination of the findings ... in this
issue will lead to more appropriate use of these therapies. Beta-Blockade
is now a mature therapy and should be prescribed to every patient
without a strong contraindication."