The American Heart
Association publishes its Top 10 Research Advances for 2002
Since 1996, the American
Heart Association has named an annual list of the top ten research
advances, and Robert O. Bonow, M.D., notes that the list for 2002
includes new treatments for myocardial infarction and heart failure,
as well as breakthroughs in cell transplantation and robotic surgery.
1. Researchers used genetic engineering to convert guinea
pig myocardial cells into biological pacemaker cells. Eventually,
this technology may lead to an alternative to implanted electronic
pacemakers in humans. The investigators had hypothesized that alteration
of potassium balance might allow the cells to depolarize spontaneously,
and they used gene therapy to block the cellular potassium channel.
The treated myocardial cells spontaneously and rhythmically depolarized
without any apparent adverse effects.
"There's still a long way to go before
the biologic pacemaker is ready for prime time. But 2002 marks the
year that researchers showed 'proof of concept,'" noted Dr.
Bonow.
Reference: Nature, September 12, 2002.
2. Study findings show that
devices can definitely improve clinical outcome for selected patient
groups.
First, implantable cardioverter defibrillators
reduce the risk of sudden cardiac death secondary to damage from
myocardial infarction or heart failure. In the twenty-month study
of 1,232 such patients, the mortality rate was 20 percent for patients
who were not given a device compared with 14 percent for patients
who were given one - a 31-percent reduction in mortality.
A second research team reported that an enhanced
pacemaker that synchronized contraction of the left and right ventricles
could prevent many patients with congestive heart failure from symptomatic
progression or death. The device has been on the market since 2001.
In the six-month study of 450 patients, those implanted with the
InSync device walked further, exercised longer, and generally felt
better. Medtronic Inc., maker of the device, funded the study.
Reference: American College of Cardiology's
Scientific Sessions, 2002.
3. A refined angioplasty
technique that includes use of a small filter to catch loose bits
of atherosclerotic plaque may offer an alternative to carotid endarterectomy.
Researchers organized a clinical trial with 307 patients: About
half had a standard carotid endarterectomy, whereas the remainder
underwent angioplasty.
At 30 days, the rate of death, myocardial
infarction and stroke was about 50 percent less in patients who
underwent refined angioplasty (5.8 percent) compared with the rate
in patients those who underwent carotid endarterectomy (12.6 percent).
To test the filter approach, the researchers
employed an experimental device dubbed Angioguard, made by Johnson
& Johnson, which funded the study. During angioplasty and stent
placement, the filter opened like an umbrella beyond the area being
treated. When the procedure was completed, the filter was closed,
trapping debris inside, covered with a tiny sheath, and removed.
Reference: American Heart Association's Scientific
Sessions, November 2002
4. Cardiovascular risks of
hormone replacement therapy are found to outweigh the benefits,
causing the Women’s Health Initiative trial to stop. Early analysis
suggested that hormone replacement therapy raised the risk of stroke
by 41 percent, of myocardial infarction by 29 percent, and of breast
cancer by 26 percent, all compared with placebo.
Because the actual number of events was so
small, six to eight excess strokes, myocardial infarctions, or breast
cancer cases could be detected in 10,000 women per year of treatment.
There was a decrease in colorectal cancers and hip fractures, but
the overall increase in risk made it clear that women should not
take combined hormone replacement therapy to prevent cardiovascular
disease.
The study followed 16,608 postmenopausal women
aged 50 to 79 years. Researchers did not find that women taking
replacement therapy were more likely to die than women who took
a placebo, but the study was stopped after the women had taken the
drugs for just over five years.
Reference: Journal of the American Medical
Association Express July 17, 2002
5. Death rates were found
to be lower in hospitals that follow treatment guidelines for myocardial
infarction than in those with low adherence to the guidelines.
Patients treated in hospitals with low adherence had a one third
greater risk of inhospital death than patients treated at hospitals
with the highest overall adherence to guidelines (mortality rates
of 17.6 percent and 11.9 percent respectively).
The study was one of the first to examine variation in treatment
and patient outcomes.
Nationally marked variation in the U.S. was found in treatment for
patients with myocardial infarction, even for well-accepted standards
of care.
Reference: American Heart Association's Scientific
Sessions, November 2002.
6. Obesity was found to be
a strong and independent risk factor for heart failure when researchers
followed 5,000 participants in the Framingham Heart Study for 15
years. After adjustment for known risk factors, obese women were
twice as likely to develop heart failure as normal-weight women,
and obese men had a 90-percent increased risk.
With each increase of 1 in body-mass index,
a man's risk of heart failure
increased 5 percent and a woman's risk increased by 7 percent.
Reference: The New England Journal of Medicine,
August 1, 2002.
7. Two large trials on atrial
fibrillation published in 2002 concluded that a much simpler and
less expensive approach (termed rate control) is at least as effective
as rhythm control in prevention of mortality. Rate control uses
drugs such as beta-blockers to suppress heart rate and symptoms.
In the Atrial Fibrillation Follow-up Investigation
in Rhythm Management (AFFIRM) trial, 4,060 patients were randomized
to rate control or rhythm control. At an average follow-up of 3.5
years, there was a trend toward fewer deaths in the rate-control
group (306 versus 356), but the difference was not statistically
significant. The number of strokes was nearly the same in both treatment
groups, and fewer hospitalizations were required for the rate-control
group.
The Rate Control versus Electrical Cardioversion
for Persistent Atrial Fibrillation (RACE) study showed similar results.
However, adverse events were more common in the rhythm-control group,
particularly in patients with hypertension.
Both trials confirmed the importance of anticoagulation
to reduce the risk of stroke in patients with atrial fibrillation.
Reference: New England Journal of Medicine,
December 5, 2002.
8. Cell transplantation therapy
was found to strengthen hearts. Several teams of researchers showed
that transplanting cells from patients' thigh muscles
or bone marrow into necrotic or weakened heart tissue during reperfusion
treatment for patients with myocardial infarction or heart failure
may have the potential to replace scar with viable muscle tissue.
In the first human testing in the United States,
doctors studied 13 patients who had a history of myocardial infarction
or heart failure and whose left-ventricular ejection fractions were
less than 30 percent. The patients' myoblasts were extracted from
thigh muscle and grown into larger quantities in the laboratory
for three to four weeks. During surgery, three to thirty direct
injections of thigh muscle cells were made into the damaged myocardium.
Interim results showed that transplanted cells remained viable inside
the heart. No significant adverse reactions were found related to
the cell transplant procedure in either group of patients nine months
later. On average, ejection fractions improved from 22.7 percent
to 35.8 percent after 12 weeks. The improvement might have been
related to the underlying procedure.
Although the trial was not designed to evaluate
the effect of cell transplant on cardiac function, the results indicate
that at least the procedure is safe and feasible.
A British team obtained similar results with
use of bone marrow cells taken from the sternum rather than myoblasts.
The researchers also studied patients who had low ejection fractions
following myocardial infarction. They reported that bone marrow
cells transplanted into the heart enhanced cardiac function - a
benefit that was evident just six weeks after transplantation and
maintained at ten months of follow-up. In their procedure, marrow
was injected directly into scar tissue identified during non-emergency
coronary artery bypass surgery.
A third, German, group also reported evidence
of improved revascularization in areas of the heart that were transplanted
with a person's own bone marrow stem cells.
Reference: American Heart Association's Scientific
Sessions, November 2002.
9. Robotically assisted cardiac
surgery successfully corrected congenital atrial septal defect without
cracking open the chest. The minimally invasive procedure required
four small incisions made under the guidance of a surgeon seated
at a high-tech console a few feet away from the patient. Two robot
arms threaded tiny surgical instruments through two of the incisions.
A camera-like device was inserted through the third hole, and a
human assistant passed surgical materials through the fourth hole.
Researchers reported results for 15 patients,
ages 22 to 68 years, who underwent repair using the robotic technology,
called the Da Vinci (TM) system. The
procedure was completely successful in 14 of the 15 patients. One
required a
repair five days later. There were no major complications. The average
hospital stay was two to four days shorter than for traditional
surgery and patients returned to normal activity about 50 percent
faster than would have been expected.
Doctors are also using robotic technology
to repair mitral valve defects through incisions in the side of
the chest and for closed-chest coronary artery bypass surgery.
Reference: American Heart Association's Scientific
Sessions, November 2002.
10. The largest study of
hypertension, the Antihypertensive and Lipid-Lowering Treatment
to Prevent Heart Attack Trial (ALLHAT), found that diuretics were
better than some newer, more expensive medications as first-line
treatment for hypertension. The trial involved 42,418 participants
aged 55 years and older. Participants had hypertension (140/90 mm
Hg or higher) and at least one other risk factor for heart disease.
Compared with the diuretic, the calcium channel
blocker resulted in about
a 1 mm Hg-higher systolic blood pressure, a 38-percent higher risk
of heart failure and a 35-percent higher risk for hospitalization.
Compared with the diuretic, the angiotensin
converting enzyme inhibitor resulted in about a 2 mm Hg-higher systolic
blood pressure (4 mm Hg higher in African-Americans), a 15-percent
higher risk of stroke (40 percent higher for African-Americans),
a 19-percent higher risk of heart failure, an 11-percent greater
risk of hospitalization or treatment for angina, and a 10-percent
greater risk for a coronary revascularization procedure.
Reference: Journal of the American Medical
Association, December 18, 2002
|