Statin treatment
may slow the progression of calcification in coronary arteries
The use of statin agents may slow the progression of arterial calcification
as well as lower cholesterol level, according to a report in the August
6th rapid access issue of Circulation. Researchers studied 66 patients
with known coronary-artery calcification. In the first study year
(without medication), coronary calcium increased roughly 25 percent.
In the second year, the patients took cerivastatin. At year's end,
coronary calcium had increased only 8.8 percent on average, and there
was no progression in patients whose low-density lipoprotein was reduced
to a level below 100 milligrams per deciliter. The authors urge further
prospective study of statin treatment, lipid levels, and progression
of intra-arterial calcification.
Full Text: The use of statin agents may slow the progression of
arterial calcification as well as lower cholesterol level, according
to a report in the August 6th rapid access issue of Circulation.
Imaging studies
such as electron beam computed tomography that can serially evaluate
intra-arterial calcium may allow doctors to monitor the progression
of coronary artery calcification, says Stephan Achenbach, M.D.,
lead author of the study. The current research is the first to prospectively
study lipid levels and progression of calcification.
The German team
studied 66 patients with known coronary-artery calcification and
hyperlipidemia (low-density lipoprotein above 130 mg/dl). All patients
underwent computed tomography at baseline and at the end of one
year. During the second year, all took cerivastatin.
The investigators
found on average that calcification progressed if untreated but
that lipid-lowering therapy with cerivastatin slowed that progression.
On average, coronary calcium increased only 8.8 percent during the
year of statin treatment compared with a 25 percent increase in
the year without treatment. Progression of calcification was completely
arrested in the population of patients in whom the statin reduced
low-density lipoprotein to a level below 100 milligrams per deciliter.
"These values
were averages and there is variability to the test," says Achenbach,
who is not certain if the findings will change practices. "We
need further research to find methods that permit us to assess the
efficacy of treatment in one single, individual patient."
|