A
Pharmacoeconomic Comparison of Docetaxel and Cisplatin vs Cyclophosphamide
and Cisplatin as First-Line Chemotherapy for Advanced Ovarian Cancer
Vera
Gorbonouva, M.D.
Cancer Research Center, Russian Academy of Medical Sciences,
Moscow, Russia
Summary:
Researchers at the Russian Academy of Medical Sicences compared the
cost effectiveness of docetaxel/cisplatin with that of cyclophosphamide/cisplatin
as first-line treatments for advanced ovarian cancer. Although the
initial direct cost of the cyclophosphamide combination was lower,
the cost effectiveness of the two regimens were similar when effectiveness
of the treatments and costs of subsequent therapy required for treatment
failure were included in the comparison.
Docetaxel is an effective treatment in combination with cisplatin
for advanced ovarian cancer. Taxane compounds like docetaxel, however,
are notably more expensive than other available treatments. Researchers
at the Russian Academy of Medical Sciences compared the total costs
associated with use of docetaxel/cisplatin with those of the less
expensive regimen of cyclophosphamide/cisplatin as first-line therapy
to assess cost effectiveness.
Costs of full treatment for 26 advanced ovarian cancer patients
started on cyclophosphamide/cisplatin from 1996 to 1998 were compared
with those for 26 patients started on docetaxel/cisplatin from 1998
to present.
As expected, direct costs of first-line docetaxel/cisplatin (7257
thousand rubles) were higher than for first-line cyclophosphamide/cisplatin
(1152 thousand rubles).
However, patients receiving first-line cyclophosphamide/cisplatin
required more cycles of second-line and subsequent treatments. These
additional treatments often included docetaxel or paclitaxel. As
a result, costs for full treatment were similar between the two
groups: 8409 thousand rubles for first-line docetaxel/cisplatin
compared with 7742 thousand rubles for the cyclophosphamide/cisplatin
regimen.
First-line docetaxel/cisplatin therapy was also more effective,
with 76% of patients achieving a clinical response compared with
60% of patients receiving first-line cyclophosphamide/cisplatin.
Thus, cost effectiveness was similar for the two regimens: 111 thousand
ruble/% cost effectiveness for docetaxel/cisplatin and 120 thousand
ruble/% cost effectiveness for cyclophosphamide/cisplatin.
The researchers emphasized the need to consider the cost of subsequent
treatment in addition to first-line costs when assessing cost effectiveness
of expensive but effective drugs such as docetaxel.