ACC food-fight
leaves delegates with no clear answers and a bitter aftertaste
Orlando, FL - A debate tackling
the relative merits of two of the most commonly touted heart-healthy
diets reached no palpable conclusions and offered little new
food for thought. As debate moderator Dr Prediman K Shah
(Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA) observed to
a bemused audience at the American College of Cardiology
50th Scientific Session, the major tenets of two diet
theories are "diametrically opposed," causing confusion for
patients, not to mention their doctors.
Dr Robert C Atkins (Atkins Center for Complementary
Medicine, New York, NY) argued in favor of his low-carbohydrate,
high-protein, high-fat diet, while Dr Dean Ornish (Preventive
Medicine Research Institute, Sausalito, CA) pushed his low-fat,
vegetarian diet and "life choice" diet. Both men have published
books extolling their own methods.
According to Atkins, "The government has been pushing a low-fat,
high-carbohydrate diet that is creating an epidemic of insulin
resistance and hyperinsulinemia."
Atkins' oft-reiterated stance was "not as a scientist but
as a clinical practitioner" with a track record of 41 years
and 20 000 patients. His argument rested on "massive evidence"
suggesting that elevated triglycerides in tandem with cholesterol
levels are a "pre-eminent" risk factor for CVD. He cited studies
supporting his theory that low-carbohydrate diets (and not
just low-calorie diets) lower triglycerides and create a "metabolic
shift" such that an "alternate metabolic pathway" is used
by the body to burn fat. High-carbohydrate diets, Atkins argued,
increase triglyceride levels, leading ultimately to insulin
disorders, diabetes, obesity, and heart disease.
Eschewing the fat
In his counter argument, Ornish began by acknowledging that
the whole area of heart-smart diets "is very confusing for
many people" and that "a little knowledge is a dangerous thing
and that is certainly an issue here."
The lack of scientific proof supporting Atkins diet surfaced
as a faithful chorus line in Ornish's argument, as did his
insistence that there are no long-term data supporting Atkins's
claims.
A low-fat, high-complex carbohydrate diet by contrast, stated
Ornish, has been more "scientifically" established as helping
people prevent heart disease, maintain a healthy lifestyle,
and even reverse disease. It is this last factor that helped
Ornish to garner some credibility for his methods, following
publication of his Lifestyle Heart Trial in the December
16, 1998 issue of JAMA.
All this talk about food
made some delegates hungry
Throughout the ACC debate, Ornish repeatedly
asserted that his method targets the underlying disease process,
whereas Atkins' diet was geared towards lowering a single risk
factor for disease and not the disease itself. When much of
the existing scientific evidence points to the harms and not
the benefits of a high-fat, high-protein diet, says Ornish,
Atkins' diet only serves to "mortgage" long-term health for
the sake of short-term pleasures. "I may be old fashioned,"
Ornish carped, "but I believe you should first have the scientific
data, then write the book."
I may be old fashioned,
but I believe you should first have the scientific
data, then write the book.
BR> Atkins' rebuttal dwelt heavily on
his own clinical experience saying he'd seen his patients improve
hundreds and thousands of times. "Dr Ornish is hooked on the
idea that the proof hasn't come as yet, and I agree at the same
time it is quite obvious from my own observations and all the
other studies related to this that the proof will come and it
will work out the way it does in the practice of medicine."
Ornish and Atkins jointly acknowledged the need for rigorous
scientific analysis of the high-protein, high-fat diet, potentially
compared to a high-carbohydrate, low-fat diet, with the specific
outcome of preventing or reducing coronary artery disease. They
also agreed - reluctantly - on the need to purge America's passion
for simple carbohydrates, likely culprits in the obesity epidemic
across North America and elsewhere.
The brief compromise, however, was short lasting. "The goal,"
griped Ornish, "is not to go from simple carbohydrates to bacon,
but rather from simple carbohydrates to complex carbohydrates."
Sources
1.Ornish D, Scherwitz LW, Billings JH, et
al. Intensive lifestyle changes for reversal of
coronary heart disease. JAMA 1998 Dec 16; 280(23):2001-7.
Shelley
Wood
shelley@conceptis.com
For
a full listing of HeartWire articles please go to theheart.org.
HeartWire is the news service of theheart.org.
Copyright HeartWire 2001. All rights reserved. Republication
or redistribution of HeartWire content is prohibited without
prior written consent.