 |
No: 1722
 |
|
 |
Beneficial Effects of Carvedilol in Patients with Ischemic Cardiomyopathy and a "Narrow" QRS: Results of the CHRISTMAS Study
Keywords:
Cardiomyopathies, Beta-adrenergic receptor blockers, Angiocardiography,
Coronary artery disease
Author Block: Jacopo Dalle Mule, Cardiology Unit,
City Hospital, Pieve di Cadore, Italy; John G Cleland, Department
of Cardiology, University of Hull, Castle Hill Hospital, Kingston
upon Hull, United Kingdom; Dudley J Pennel, Royal Brompton Hospital
Imperial College, London, United Kingdom; Renzo Perelli, Nuclear Medicine
Unit, City Hospital, Belluno, Italy; Alberto Cuocolo, Universita Federico
II, Napoli, Italy; Gordon Murray, Andrew J Coats; Cardiology Unit,
City Hospital, Pieve di Cadore, Italy
|
 |
Introduction: QRS width
is commonly used as a maker of cardiac dyssynchrony and multisite
pacing is employed for resynchronization therapy, however a substantial
proportion of patients in functional class III-IV do not experience
any clinical benefit and QRS duration is not correlated with mechanical
improvement.
Hypothesis: We hypothesized that
imaging with radionuclide ventriculography could help identify patients
with dyssynchrony despite a "narrow" QRS, and assess the
beneficial effect of carvedilol on contractile synchrony and mechanical
function.
Methods: We measured QRS duration,
LVEF, intra- and interventricular conduction delay by means of phase
analysis in 164 patients of the CHRISTMAS Study, who underwent radionuclide
ventriculography (RNVG) at the time of randomization and at the
end of the maintenance phase of treatment with carvedilol or placebo
(PL).
Results: QRS duration at baseline
and at final examination was 107 ± 28 and 107 ± 27 ms, respectively,
it was not different in the PL vs carvedilol group both at baseline
(110±30 ms vs 104±5 ms) and at final examination (113±28 vs 107±26).
The degree of interventricular dyssynchrony (difference in LV and
RV mean phase angles) did not change from baseline to the final
visit in the PL group (11 ±17 vs 12 ±9), while it improved in the
carvedilol group (13 ±17 vs 9 ±14; p<0.01). The degree of intraventricular
dyssynchrony (std deviation of the mean phase angle) significantly
improved for LV in the carvedilol group (54 ±18 vs 51 ±19; p=0.04),
but did not change for both the RV (41 ±12 vs 41 ±11) and the LV
(57 ±14 vs 56 ±19) in the PL group, and for the RV in the carvedilol
group (40 ±14 vs 30 ±10). No correlation existed between QRS width
and interventricular dyssynchrony, both at baseline (R = 0.05, p=0.2)
and at final exam (R = 0.16, p=0.01). LVEF (%) increased from 29
±10 to 31 ±11 between basal and final examination, an improvement
in EF (increase >= 5 units) was observed in 78% (40/51) of the
patients who improved LV intraventricular synchrony.
Conclusion: Treatment with carvedilol
in patients with ischemic cardiomyopathy improves both inter- and
intra-ventricular synchrony, and mechanical function of the LV,
independetly of QRS duration. Improvement in synchrony with carvedilol
was not associated with a shortening of QRS. |
|
|