Many patients undergo carotid endarterectomy,
but this procedure has surgical risks. Carotid angioplasty plus
stent is an alternative treatment. To reduce risk in carotid
stenting, proper patient selection is important. The use of
protective devices in carotid stenting is very promising. A
potentially useful procedure is extracranial-intracranial bypass
surgery. Japanese investigators have started a trial to assess
the effectiveness of this procedure in a randomized fashion.
Many patients with carotid artery stenosis have received
carotid endarterectomy (CEA) for prevention of ischemic stroke.
American Heart Association guidelines state that CEA has a
proven indication in symptomatic patients with at least 70%
stenosis. The procedure is acceptable in patients with 50%
to 69% stenosis.
The North American Symptomatic CEA Trial (NASCET) included
patients with symptomatic patients with carotid stenosis.
Risk of ipsilateral stroke for medically treated patients
was 26% at 2 years. In the CEA group, stroke risk was 9%.
There are surgical risks to CEA. Surgical complications at
30 days in the NASCET trial included death (1.1%), disabling
stroke (1.8%) and non-disabling stroke (3.7%). Almost 10%
of patients had perioperative wound complications and 9% had
cranial nerve injury.
Carotid angioplasty plus stent is available as an alternative
treatment. However, it is dangerous to put a stent in patients
with soft plaque, fresh thrombi or aortic plaque. This is
because the stent can dislodge the atheromatous plaque and
cause cerebral embolism. These patients should receive CEA
instead of carotid stenting.
There is controversy over how to treat patients who require
both CEA and coronary artery bypass graft. There is an operative
risk of cerebrovascular attack, myocardial infarction and
death.
Off-pump coronary artery bypass graft can reduce risk of
neurologic complications. In the reported experience of investigators
at the National Cardiovascular Center in Osaka, off-pump procedure
had a 0% risk of neurologic complications. In comparison,
on-pump procedures had a 6.4% risk. Therefore, the off-pump
procedure is very useful in reducing the total risk of patients
who need to have both bypass and CEA.
Complications in off-pump CAB (NCVC
Japan)
|
Off-pump (n=95)
|
On-pump (n=63) |
Time
(minutes) |
351
± 85 |
450
± 112 |
Intubation (hours) |
5.1 ± 2.8 |
13.7 ±
17.9 |
Intensive
care Unit (ICU) stays (days) |
3.0 ± 1.4 |
3.6 ± 1.8 |
Neurological
complications |
0.0% |
6.4% |
Atrial fibrillation |
20.0% |
17.5% |
Perioperative
acute myocardial infarction (AMI) |
14.7% |
11.1% |
|
In patients with severely impaired cerebral blood flow, bypass
surgery may be very useful to increase blood flow and prevent
recurrent stroke. Now in Japan, researchers are conducting
a controlled, randomized study of extracranial-intracranial
(EC-IC) bypass surgery.
The Japan EC-IC Bypass Trial (JET) includes 280 patients
randomized to either surgery or medical therapy. The patients
are followed for 2 years to assess rates of stroke, death,
disability and uncontrollable transient ischemic attacks.
The JET study includes patients with minor stroke or transient
ischemic attack due to occlusion or severe stenosis of the
internal carotid artery or medial cerebral artery. The study
excludes patients with cervical internal carotid artery stenosis.
The patients must be less than 73 years old and the stroke
or transient ischemic attack must have occurred within 3 months
of the trial. Baseline cerebral blood flow must be severely
impaired (less than 80% of normal value).
Interim results at 1 year show that EC-IC bypass is effective
in preventing stroke recurrence. Because of this promising
data, investigators hope and believe that bypass surgery will
become an accepted treatment for ischemic stroke.
|