Carvedilol Initiation by Community Physicians in COHERE: Comparison with U.S. Carvedilol Trials and Compassionate Use Protocols
Barry M. Massie
University of California San Francisco
San Francisco, CA, USA

Investigators compared data on heart failure patients in carvedilol clinical trials with patients who received carvedilol in community medical practice. Patients in the community were older, more often female, and had less severe heart failure than patients in clinical trials. There were differences in titration rates and target dosage. However, most patients in COHERE continued on treatment. The results suggest that community physicians can successfully initiate and maintain carvedilol treatment.

Results of heart failure trials may not be generalizable to community practice. This is partly because patients in clinical trials are different. They are usually younger and more often male. They have less comorbidity and are more likely to adhere to medication regimens, compared with patients in the community.

Another factor is the treating physician. In clinical trials, doctors are more specialized. They are more likely to have support from nurses and coordinators compared with community practitioners.

A registry that illustrates experience with carvedilol in community treated heart failure patients is now available. This registry is called the Coreg Heart Failure Registry (COHERE). It includes data from 633 participating physicians on 4,273 unselected heart failure patients.

Physicians who contributed data to the COHERE registry include cardiologists and non-cardiologists who work in the community practice setting. The data set does not include the experience of full time faculty members or specialists in heart failure.

To illustrate differences between clinical trials and community practice, investigators compared COHERE registry with data from 1,094 patients in carvedilol randomized clinical trials and 2,981 patients in open label carvedilol compassionate use trials.

Investigators have not yet fully evaluated outcomes data. However, some interesting differences emerged.

The COHERE registry contained more older patients and more women than in the clinical trials. In addition, patients in COHERE had higher left ventricular ejection fraction and less severe New York Heart Association functional class than the clinical trial patients.

Patient Characteristics: COHERE and Carvedilol Clinical Trials
 
COHERE
Compassionate use
Clinical trials
Age (years)
66 ± 13
60 ± 13
58 ± 12
Female
35%
25%
23%
New York Heart Association class III/IV
38%
62%
47%
Mean left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF)
31 ± 12%
Not available
23 ± 7%
All comparisons of compassionate use or clinical trials vs. COHERE were significant (P < 0.001).

The COHERE patients were also less likely to be on background treatment with digoxin, diuretics and angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors.

Titration took longer in the COHERE registry patients, and fewer patients reached target maintenance doses of 25-50 mg twice daily compared with clinical trial patients. On the other hand, most patients continued carvedilol treatment in COHERE.

Titration Experience
 
Carvedilol titration experience
COHERE titration experience
 
COHERE
(n=3,861)
Clinical
trials

Compassionate use

Cardiologists'
patients
(n = 2,869)
Non-cardiologists'
patients
(n = 992)
No. titration days
75 ± 46
NA
54 ± 32*
75 ± 45
75 ± 48
Titrated to 25-50 mg bid
45%
85%*
93%*
50%
30%**
Carvedilol discontinued
9%
12%
7%*
10%
6%**
* P < 0.001 vs. COHERE
** P < 0.001
NA = Not available

As expected, physicians participating in COHERE were less likely to be cardiologists. They were also less to have an academic affiliation or practice at a hospital.

This registry data provides a broader picture of physician practice in the community. Future observational studies should also consider the differences between clinical trials and community experience in the treatment of heart failure with beta-blockers.


Reporter: Andrew Bowser